Author
Listed:
- Wen-Jui Tseng
- Ji-Feng Ding
- Chien-Chang Chou
- Fu-Ting Hsu
- Yu-Meng Wang
- Ya-Ning Liu
- Nai-Wen Chang
- Yi-Wen Wu
Abstract
As the development of refrigerated container, transportation of aquatic products is growing rapidly in recent years. It is very important to avoid cargos damages for aquatic products of refrigerated containers, while the shipping operators are running this scope of business. Hence, the risk issue of adopting various improvement strategies would be important for the container shipping operators. In the light of this, the main purpose of this paper is to analyze the risks of cargos damages for aquatic products of refrigerated containers based on the container shipping operators’ perspective in Taiwan. We use four risk assessment procedures - risk identification, risk analysis and evaluation, risk strategies, and risk treatment - as the research method in this paper. The risk factors are generated from literature review and experts interviewing. Then, three dimensions with nineteen risk factors are preliminary identified. We used these risk factors to proceed with the empirical study via questionnaires. Three points of empirical results are presented. At first, the top factor of perceived risk as well as of risk severity is ‘container data setting errors.’ Secondly, the top factor of risk frequency is ‘lack of the goods’ pre-cooling themselves.’ Thirdly, three risk factors are classified into the low-risk area, whereas sixteen risk factors are placed on the medium-risk area. There is no risk factor fix on the high-risk area. Furthermore, three risk strategies - risk prevention, risk reduction, and risk transfer - are suggested to adopt by different risk factors.
Suggested Citation
Wen-Jui Tseng & Ji-Feng Ding & Chien-Chang Chou & Fu-Ting Hsu & Yu-Meng Wang & Ya-Ning Liu & Nai-Wen Chang & Yi-Wen Wu, 2012.
"Risk Analysis of Cargos Damages for Aquatic Products of Refrigerated Containers: Shipping Operators’ Perspective in Taiwan,"
Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(2), pages 86-94, February.
Handle:
RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:2:id:150
DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v4i2.968
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:2:id:150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AMH International (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://amhinternational.com/imbr .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.