IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v4y2012i1p35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thai Consumers’ Perception on Herbal Cosmetic Products: A Comparative Study of Thai and Imported Products

Author

Listed:
  • Rojanadilok Thanisorn
  • Bunchapattanasakda Chanchai

Abstract

This research investigated the factors that influence perception of Thai consumers on facial herbal cosmetic products in Thailand. In- depth interview the perception of Thai consumers was utilized in data collection, while content analysis was employed in data analysis. The facial herbal cosmetics products are moisturizer, whitening lotions, creams, powder, toner, make up cleansing, mask, cleansing oil, soap bar, anti-aging lotions and creams. This study revealed that most of the interviewees were female with age between 26-30 years, casual worker ,bachelor degree being the highest education and salary from 10,000 -15,000 baht ($285-430) per month. The marketing mix (4Ps: product, price, place and promotion) were the key factors influencing Thai consumers’ perception on facial herbal cosmetic products. The result found that Thai consumers were satisfied with physical appearance of products; texture, odor, penetration- characteristic and viscosity. Thai consumers trust in the safety of the Thai and imported products. The imported products have new manufacturing technologies of production compare with the Thai products but imported products are more expensive than Thai products. Thai consumers were satisfied with packaging design and pump bottle shape of imported products. Thai consumers found it was convenience to purchasing both herbal products from department store. The direct sale is popular only for Thai products. The imported products had more interesting marketing promotion than the Thai products. The marketing promotions are new product premium, promotion campaign eg. Cash discount, gift premium, fortune, tarot horoscope, makes up and massage workshop. Thai consumers were satisfied with advertisement of both herbal products; brochure, leaflet, beauty information from general magazine, fashion magazine, general book, television and radio. The economic situation, such as inflation situation, is the majority factor of purchasing decision. The average cosmetic budget per each purchase is 1,800 baht (about $50) at the rate of eight purchases per year.

Suggested Citation

  • Rojanadilok Thanisorn & Bunchapattanasakda Chanchai, 2012. "Thai Consumers’ Perception on Herbal Cosmetic Products: A Comparative Study of Thai and Imported Products," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 4(1), pages 35-40.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:35-40
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v4i1.961
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/961/961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/961
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v4i1.961?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarina Ismail & Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar, 2016. "Linking attitude to actual purchase of herbal product in Malaysia: The moderating role of perceived risk," Journal of Asian Business Strategy, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 6(2), pages 22-30, February.
    2. Kanupriya Adlakha & Sanjeev Sharma, 2020. "Brand Positioning Using Multidimensional Scaling Technique: An Application to Herbal Healthcare Brands in Indian Market," Vision, , vol. 24(3), pages 345-355, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.