IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v3y2011i6id87.html

The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Quality of Public Budget Preparation

Author

Listed:
  • Z-John Liu
  • Justine Chang

Abstract

The study explores the relationship between organizational commitment of workers in public sectors and the quality of budget preparation. Through questionnaire survey, the study is conducted on people working on budget planning and preparation. The multi-layer regression analysis method implemented on empirical evidence finds that organizational commitment and task uncertainly each have significantly positive and negative effect on the quality of budget preparation, respectively, while under a high task uncertainty, the retrospective effects of independent variables have significant effect on quality of budget preparation. Based on the above findings, the study proposes that an enhancement on organizational commitment of budget preparers will help to increase the quality of budget preparation.

Suggested Citation

  • Z-John Liu & Justine Chang, 2011. "The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Quality of Public Budget Preparation," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 3(6), pages 345-359, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:3:y:2011:i:6:id:87
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v3i6.951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amhinternational.com/imbr/article/view/87-the-relationship-between-organizational-commitment-and-quality-of-public-budget-preparation
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://amhinternational.com/imbr/article/download/87-the-relationship-between-organizational-commitment-and-quality-of-public-budget-preparation/9d4dd405-832c-40fd-928e-c7fbccb17c64
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v3i6.951?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:3:y:2011:i:6:id:87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AMH International (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://amhinternational.com/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.