IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v18y2026i1p88-96.html

Twelve Years of Corruption Perception Index: A Tale of Malaysia and Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Aishah Mohd Ali
  • Rozaiha Ab Majid
  • Siti Aisyah Basri
  • Bayu Tri Cahya
  • Mohd Waliuddin Mohd Razali

Abstract

Corruption remains a major challenge to governance, public trust, and institutional legitimacy in Southeast Asia. This study compares trends in the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) in Malaysia and Indonesia from 2012 to 2024 using annual data published by Transparency International. It examines how changes in CPI scores and rankings corresponded with major political transitions, institutional reforms, and anti-corruption developments in both countries. Through a qualitative approach, this study interprets CPI trends alongside key political and governance events identified through content analysis. The findings show that Malaysia recorded higher CPI scores than Indonesia throughout the period, although its performance remained unstable post 2020 amid political turnover and governance uncertainty. In Indonesia, CPI data observed pre-2020 were not sustained, with subsequent declines coinciding with reforms widely seen as weakening the autonomy of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). These patterns imply that improvements in corruption perception are difficult to sustain without institutional continuity, credible enforcement, and political commitment to reform. By comparing two neighboring democracies with different reform paths, this study contributes to the broader debate on corruption, governance, and political accountability and offers policy-relevant insights to strengthen anti-corruption institutions in both countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Aishah Mohd Ali & Rozaiha Ab Majid & Siti Aisyah Basri & Bayu Tri Cahya & Mohd Waliuddin Mohd Razali, 2026. "Twelve Years of Corruption Perception Index: A Tale of Malaysia and Indonesia," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 18(1), pages 88-96.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:88-96
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v18i1(j).4807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4807/3210
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4807
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v18i1(j).4807?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:18:y:2026:i:1:p:88-96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.