IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v17y2025i3p1-8.html

The Effectiveness of Writing an Argumentative Essay Using Google Docs Among Engineering Students

Author

Listed:
  • Ummi Habibah Mohd Shakil
  • Nurul Syifaa Mohd Shakil

Abstract

This research study focuses on the effectiveness of using Google Docs in enhancing the writing of argumentative essays among engineering students. The aim is to investigate how the integration of Google Docs as a digital writing tool impacts the development of argumentative writing skills. The study also explores the relationship between the usage of Google Docs and the improvement of key components in argumentative essay writing, including claims, counter-claims, reasons, and evidence. The research adopts a quantitative approach, incorporating pre-tests, post-test 1, and post-test 2 to assess students' writing performance before and after utilising Google Docs. A questionnaire is employed to strengthen the proof of students' understanding and experiences regarding the usage of Google Docs in their writing process. The results will contribute to the existing literature on technology-enhanced writing instruction, particularly in the field of engineering education. The study's implications may inform educators, curriculum designers, and policy-makers in designing effective strategies to enhance students' writing skills and foster their engagement in the writing process.

Suggested Citation

  • Ummi Habibah Mohd Shakil & Nurul Syifaa Mohd Shakil, 2025. "The Effectiveness of Writing an Argumentative Essay Using Google Docs Among Engineering Students," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(3), pages 1-8.
  • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1-8
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4696/3054
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/4696
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v17i3(I).4696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.