IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rnd/arimbr/v15y2023i2p215-225.html

Breast Cancer Management Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz
  • Mass Hareeza Ali
  • Ahmad Taufik Jamil
  • Yuhanis Ab Aziz

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most prevalent type of cancer in women and has a significant economic impact worldwide. Consequently, there is a need to analyze the disease's research trend academically to determine the breast cancer publishing trend based on a certain period of its collection properties. Bibliometric analysis is used to examine the research trend in breast cancer care through time using various data. Several tools, including the PRISMA flow diagram, Microsoft Excel for frequency analysis, Harzing's Publish or Perish for citation metrics and other pertinent analyses, and VOSviewer for image visualization and bibliometric networks, were used to study this article. Using the TITLE search strategy and the Scopus database, 3,532 articles were located. It was discovered that the trends in research publications rose steadily from one year to the next. Between 1932 and 2021, 3,532 publications will be produced with a total of 61,274 citations, which breaks down to 688.47 citations per year, 17.35 citations per cited paper, and 4.02 citations per author. The United States, Italy, and the United Kingdom have produced the most co-authored works in this discipline. Even though the annual incidence rate of breast cancer remains high, these findings appear promising for determining the most effective treatments, procedures, and management strategies. The guideline standard requires further attention at a higher level.

Suggested Citation

  • Nor Intan Shamimi Abdul Aziz & Mass Hareeza Ali & Ahmad Taufik Jamil & Yuhanis Ab Aziz, 2023. "Breast Cancer Management Research Trends: A Bibliometric Analysis," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(2), pages 215-225.
    • Handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:215-225
    DOI: 10.22610/imbr.v15i2(I)SI.3358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/3358/2164
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr/article/view/3358
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22610/imbr.v15i2(I)SI.3358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shakil Ahmad & Shafiq Ur Rehman & Abid Iqbal & Rai Khalid Farooq & Arslan Shahid & Muhammad Ikram Ullah, 2021. "Breast Cancer Research in Pakistan: A Bibliometric Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behzad Gholampour & Sajad Gholampour & Alireza Noruzi & Clément Arsenault & Thomas Haertlé & Ali Akbar Saboury, 2022. "Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1841-1865, April.
    2. Inzamam Mashood Nasir & Masad A. Alrasheedi & Nasser Aedh Alreshidi, 2024. "MFAN: Multi-Feature Attention Network for Breast Cancer Classification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Sida Feng & Lingzi Feng & Fang Han & Ye Zhang & Yanqing Ren & Lixue Wang & Junpeng Yuan, 2024. "Citation network analysis of retractions in molecular biology field," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(8), pages 4795-4817, August.
    4. Beni Suranto & Nataša Kovač & Kholid Haryono & Siti Fadzillah Abdul Rahman & Amer Fareed Mohd Shukri & Marcin Suder & Rafał Kusa & Dragica Žugić, 2026. "State of digitalization in the Southeast Asia region – bibliometric analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 60(1), pages 1053-1080, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rnd:arimbr:v:15:y:2023:i:2:p:215-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Muhammad Tayyab (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ojs.amhinternational.com/index.php/imbr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.