Sunk Capacity Costs, Long-Run Fixed Costs, and Entry Deterrence under Complete and Incomplete Information
This article considers a three-stage, extensive form game where capacity, once installed, is sunk but where fixed costs are not sunk. We show that there may be multiple perfect equilibria of the complete information game. When the entrant is incompletely informed about the incumbent's cost, the entrant may use the incumbent's capacity choice as a signal of the incumbent's cost. We present an example where the incumbent prefers a noninformative capacity signal, since this has the effect of reducing the scale of entry. We present a second example where the entrant is incompletely informed because the incumbent makes a choice over production technologies that is unobservable to the entrant.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 17 (1986)
Issue (Month): 1 (Spring)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.rje.org|
|Order Information:||Web: https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/rje_online.cgi|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:randje:v:17:y:1986:i:spring:p:105-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.