IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rje/bellje/v2y1971iautumnp606-625.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Theory of Pricing and Decision-Making for Public Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Edna Loehman
  • Andrew Whinston

Abstract

This paper presents a theory for price-setting in public utilities, of which public goods will be considered a special case. Both public goods and utilities are cases of joint supplies and costs, where a good is to be supplied to and paid for by several users, and any increase in the quantity of the good is equally available to all users. The pricing system proposed will be based on the idea of each user's paying the social incremental costs due to his demands. To a certain extent, Coase proposed a similar idea, but it was not worked out except in special cases. The concept has been difficult to apply due to problems in defining incremental cost when there are joint costs. A meaningful definition of social incremental cost will be given here. Where the classical assumptions hold, our theory reduces to marginal-cost pricing; however, in the case of decreasing costs, results different from marginal-cost pricing are obtained. Since users may have quite different demands, incremental-cost charges will not be uniform. However, the incremental-cost system does posses certain equity properties. Furthermore, this system of charges will cover the complete costs of supplying a public service. Finally, the concept of incremental cost implies that, at the optimum investment, the marginal unit should be charged marginal cost, which is the condition necessary for welfare maximization.

Suggested Citation

  • Edna Loehman & Andrew Whinston, 1971. "A New Theory of Pricing and Decision-Making for Public Investment," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 2(2), pages 606-625, Autumn.
  • Handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:2:y:1971:i:autumn:p:606-625
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0005-8556%28197123%292%3A2%3C606%3AANTOPA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-J&origin=repec
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sandler, Todd & Tschirhart, John T, 1980. "The Economic Theory of Clubs: An Evaluative Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 18(4), pages 1481-1521, December.
    2. David Encaoua & Michel Moreaux, 1987. "L'analyse théorique des problèmes de tarification et d'allocation des coûts dans les télécommunications," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 38(2), pages 375-414.
    3. John G. Hof & Doug Rideout, 1993. "A Probabilistic Approach To Joint Cost Allocation in Public Projects," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 399-414, October.
    4. Edna Tusak Loehman & Richard Kiser & Stephen J. Rassenti, 2014. "Cost Share Adjustment Processes for Cooperative Group Decisions About Shared Goods: A Design Approach," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1085-1126, September.
    5. Mirucki, Jean, 1980. "Vérification des conditions d'efficacité dans la production chez Bell Canada [Checking the conditions of efficient production in Bell Canada]," MPRA Paper 30147, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jun 1980.
    6. Mirucki, Jean, 1980. "Comportement de l'entreprise réglementée: étude de l'hypothèse Averch-Johnson [Behavior of the Regulated Firm: A Study of the Averch-Johnson Hypothesis]," MPRA Paper 27669, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 1982.
    7. Rigoberto Ariel Yépez, 2001. "The Secondary Market for Capacity in Natural Gas Transportation," Economía Mexicana NUEVA ÉPOCA, CIDE, División de Economía, vol. 0(1), pages 107-119, January-J.
    8. Danny Ben-Shahar & Yongheng Deng & Eyal Sulganik, 2006. "Shapley Cost Allocation Coincides with Relative Status: The Case of Skyscrapers," Working Paper 8567, USC Lusk Center for Real Estate.
    9. Otero, Jesus & Waddams Price, Catherine, 2001. "Incumbent and entrant response to regulated competition: signaling with accounting costs and market prices2," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(2-3), pages 209-223.
    10. Bara, Zoltán, 1998. "A tisztességes elosztás mikroökonómiai elmélete [The microeconomic theory of fair distribution]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 558-575.
    11. Edna T. Loehman, 2009. "Voluntary Cost-Sharing for Environmental Risk Reduction: A Pollution Abatement Case Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 349-368, July.
    12. E. Loehman & A. Whinston, 1974. "An Axiomatic Approach to Cost Allocation for Public Investment," Public Finance Review, , vol. 2(2), pages 236-250, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rje:bellje:v:2:y:1971:i:autumn:p:606-625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rje.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.