Financial stability in the Eurozone: where do we stand?
At the start of the EMU, concerns about fiscal and monetary stability dominated the academic debate. In contrast, financial stability issues were largely overlooked. Since then, more attention has been paid to the implications of the EMU for financial regulation and supervision and to the drawbacks of government involvement in the domestic financial sector, both as owner and as debtor. This paper reassesses these issues and draws the following conclusions. Firstly, little progress has been made in centralizing financial supervision in the Eurozone. Secondly, with the exception of Germany, all Eurozone countries have made substantial progress in reducing state ownership in their banking systems. Thirdly, limited progress has been made in the reduction of bank exposures to domestic public debt. A continued retreat of governments from the financial sector is desirable, leaving bank ownership to the private sector, holdings of government debt to the public, and supervision to a specialized, independent European institution.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
Volume (Year): 19 (2007)
Issue (Month): ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +1 212 284 8600
Web page: http://www.capco.com/
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:jofitr:1401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Springett)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.