IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ecoint/0184.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Growth and Income Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Seghezza, Elena

    (Università di Genova, Facoltà di Scienze Politiche, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Finanziarie)

Abstract

In the period just after the Second World War, Italy experienced an increase in labour productivity bigger than the increase in real wages. The recurrent explanations of this phenomenon build on the weakness of labour trade unions due to a large “reserve industrial army”. With the passing of time, such “army” should have been reduced, and there should have been a progressive growth of the bargaining power of labour trade unions. However, the empirical evidence shows that the strength of labour trade union (measured, at least, as number of members) decreased for all the 1950s. Notwithstanding, the gap between productivity and real wage growth tend to close. This paper tries to explain this process focussing, instead on the labour supply side, on the labour demand side, in particular on the evolution of the bargaining power of the industrial firm trade union, Confindustria. In effect, in the 1950s, Confindustria was a compact union, which represented almost exclusively the few big industries present in the country. With the entry of Italy in the European Economic Community and the following period of high exports and growth, the number of firms members of Confindustria increased significantly. Given the increasing disparity of interests of members, the compactness of Confindustria broke up; its bargaining power decreased. Based on this ascertainment, the paper explains the increase in real wages recorded in the 1950s with the decrease in the firms’ monopsony power. Such explanation is done using a neoclassical growth model with intra-industry trade and monopsony in the labour market. The model offers two results. First, an increase in the steady state capital stock, due for example to trade liberalization, leads to an increase in the labour share of income. Second, the effect of growth on the income labour share is higher at the early stage of development.

Suggested Citation

  • Seghezza, Elena, 2002. "Economic Growth and Income Inequality," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 55(3), pages 371-398.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0184
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongpeng Guo & Yang Yang & Chulin Pan & Shuang Xu & Nan Yan & Qingyong Lei, 2022. "Study on the Impact of Income Gap on Health Level of Rural Residents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Ranran Li & Ziyuan Ding & Yan An, 2022. "Examination and Forecast of Relationship among Tourism, Environment, and Economy: A Case Study in Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-15, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F12 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies; Fragmentation
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F16 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade and Labor Market Interactions
    • J42 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Particular Labor Markets - - - Monopsony; Segmented Labor Markets
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ecoint:0184. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Angela Procopio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cacogit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.