IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/badest/0372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reproductive Change in Bangladesh and the Latent Demand Hypothesis : What is the Evidence?

Author

Listed:
  • Mahmud , Simeen

    (Research Director, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS))

Abstract

Three phases of changing population growth in Bangladesh can be identified. The first phase, upto 1931, was the period of very low growth, often even negative growth in specific years, characterized by moderately high fertility and very high mortality levels. The second phase, between 1931 and 1981, was a period of rising growth, even "explosive" growth rates nearing 3 per cent per annum, characterized by falling mortality levels but unchanging fertility levels. This was followed by a third phase upto the present of declining population growth rate, characterized by continued falling mortality levels but at a slower pace and falling fertility levels since the mid-1970s, with the decline in population growth rate gaining momentum after 1985.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahmud , Simeen, 1997. "Reproductive Change in Bangladesh and the Latent Demand Hypothesis : What is the Evidence?," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 25(1-2), pages 125-142, March-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:badest:0372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fertility; Fertility rates; Female fertility; Women; Birth control; Family size; Development studies; Demography; Children;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:badest:0372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Meftaur Rahman, Cheif Publication Officer, BIDS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bidssbd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.