IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/ambsrv/0058.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient Supply Chain Contracting with Loss-averse Players in Presence of Multiple Plausible Breaches

Author

Listed:
  • Mitra, Arijit

    (Xavier Institute of Management Bhubaneswar (XIMB))

  • Sarkar, Sumit

    (XLRI-Xavier School of Management)

Abstract

The legal literature distinguishes between the liquidated damage and the penalty clauses in contracts, and holds that penalties designed for the prevention of breach are excessive compared to the liquidated damages. In an efficient supply chain contract, the penalty must satisfy the participation and incentive compatibility constraints of the signatories. Considering loss-averse players, we have calculated optimal penalties in a supply chain contract and compared those with the liquidated damages. Two possible breaches are considered – a breach in quality of the delivery and a breach in the process. In the absence of any penalty, a process breach reduces the supplier’s delivery risk and cost of delivery. Determining the parametric conditions for efficient contracts, numerically we show the effects of various variables on the zone of efficient contract. We show that the optimal penalties need not be excessive compared to the liquidated damages.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitra, Arijit & Sarkar, Sumit, 2022. "Efficient Supply Chain Contracting with Loss-averse Players in Presence of Multiple Plausible Breaches," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 25(2), pages 270-292, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:ambsrv:0058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://digitalcommons.newhaven.edu/americanbusinessreview/vol25/iss2/3/
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Contract; Liquidated Damage; Loss-aversion; Penalty; Supply Chain;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G33 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Bankruptcy; Liquidation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:ambsrv:0058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amber Montano (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbnhaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.