IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

La dimensión regional de la UE y el proceso de debate sobre el futuro de Europa

  • Cristina Ares Castro-Conde
Registered author(s):

    RESUMEN El objetivo de este trabajo es explicar el reforzamiento de la dimensión regional de la UE en el Tratado por el que se establece una Constitución para Europa. El artículo incorpora ciertos instrumentos del acervo teórico del neo-institucionalismo sociológico y el constructivismo a una perspectiva que se mantiene fundamentalmente intergubernamentalista con el propósito de llamar la atención no sólo sobre la dimensión estratégica sino también sobre la dimensión normativa que subyace a todo proceso de reforma institucional. La evidencia presentada permite concluir que el fortalecimiento del papel de las regiones en el texto del Tratado Constitucional es fruto de un compromiso entre los Ejecutivos centrales de los Estados miembros con regiones poderosas en su seno, capaces de influir en la posición negociadora de su respectivo Gobierno central, y el resto de Gobiernos centrales de la Unión, indiferentes o contrarios a las demandas de los actores regionales. Se constata también que el “discurso democrático” en favor de la descentralización política tuvo importancia tanto en la definición de la posición negociadora de algunos Estados miembros como en el proceso negociador mismo, dificultando un hipotético veto a los logros del lobby territorial en la Conferencia Intergubernamental. ABSTRACT The aim of this paper is to explain the reinforcement of EU regional dimension in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe. The article incorporates certain sociological neo-institutionalism and constructivism devices into a perspective which rests fundamentally intergubernamentalist with the purpose of shedding light not only on the strategic dimension but also on the normative one underlying all institutional reform processes. The conclusion is that the strengthening of EU regional authorities was a compromise between, on the one hand, some central executives of member states with powerful regions within them capable of influencing their bargaining positions and, on the other hand, other member states which were reluctant to regional demands. Indeed, the “democratic discourse” in favour of political decentralization did influence the definition of the bargaining position of some member states and, above all, it made more difficult to veto territorial gains at the Intergovernmental Conference.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/pdfs/pdf1033.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/articulo.php?id_art=1033
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Universidades Públicas de Andalucía in its journal Revista de Estudios Regionales.

    Volume (Year): 01 (2008)
    Issue (Month): ()
    Pages: 149-170

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:rer:articu:v:01:y:2008:p:149-170
    Contact details of provider: Postal: Plaza del Ejido s/n 29071, Málaga
    Phone: 952131150
    Fax: 952131167
    Web page: http://www.revistaestudiosregionales.com/Email:


    More information through EDIRC

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:

    as in new window
    1. Gary Marks & Liesbet Hooghe, 2000. "Optimality and Authority: A Critique of Neoclassical Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 795-816, December.
    2. Markus Jachtenfuchs, 2001. "The Governance Approach to European Integration," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 245-264, 06.
    3. Mark A. Pollack, 2000. "The End of Creeping Competence? EU Policy-Making Since Maastricht," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 519-538, 09.
    4. Angela K. Bourne, 2003. "The Impact of European Integration on Regional Power," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41, pages 597-620, 09.
    5. Hooghe, Liesbet & Marks, Gary, 2001. "Types of Multi-Level Governance," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 5, October.
    6. Johan P. Olsen, 2002. "Reforming European Institutions of Governance," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 581-602, November.
    7. Hall, Peter A. & Taylor, Rosemary C. R., 1996. "Political science and the three new institutionalisms," MPIfG Discussion Paper 96/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Wolfgang Wessels, 1997. "An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 267-299, 06.
    9. Andrew Moravcsik & Kalypso Nicolaïdis, 1999. "Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, Influence, Institutions," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 59-85, 03.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rer:articu:v:01:y:2008:p:149-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jesús Sánchez Fernández)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.