Differences between a normal and a great crisis. A comparison between the one in 1929 and the current one in 2007 (this text is a part of the Introduction of the authors last book entitled The lethal crisis)
The crises witnessed by capitalistic economies may be distinguished into two categories, according to the intensity, the duration and the extent of the disasters caused by them. In what concerns the first category, the normal or current crisis, it is referred to the cyclical fluctuations which are an inherent characteristic of capitalism, fluctuations of private initiative determined by the degree of confidence investors have in the future, that determine, in turn, the intensity of economic activity. It is here that we find the undue excitement and over optimism on the part of investors who are willing to undertake extreme risks, because they tend to overrate future returns on their investments. The current crisis we are facing belongs to the category of great ones and is the second one witnessed by mankind in the last eighty years. The artcle also presents several similarities between the current crisis and the 1929 crisis, such as the moral crisis (characterized by extreme individualism, the pursuit of maximum profit and greed), sky-high remunerations of the golden boys- the managers and bosses of the financial sector then and now, or the shift towards right or extreme right wing parties, in both cases.
Volume (Year): 1 (2010)
Issue (Month): 2 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.distribution-magazine.eu|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rdc:journl:v:1:y:2010:i:2:p:8-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Theodor Valentin Purcarea)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.