IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rar/journl/0192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the Crisis: Back to the Classics!

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Lunghini

Abstract

Why had so few economists foreseen the crisis? The main reason is that economics has turned into a branch of applied mathematics, detached from real world institutions. In a monetary economy of production, real factors and financial factors are intertwined, and crisis is consequently no mere chance. Keynes and Marx show that the opposite is true: equilibrium can only come about by accident or design, for equilibrium ein Zufall ist. The shortcomings of the economic society in which we live are its failure to provide for full employment and its arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth and incomes, i.e. the same faults denounced by Keynes in 1936. And Keynes’s social philosophy is the only way out.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Lunghini, 2010. "On the Crisis: Back to the Classics!," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 3, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:rar:journl:0192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Riviste.asp?IDArticolo=40178&Tipo=Articolo%20PDF&lingua=en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Role of economics; Role of economists; Financial crisis; History of economic thought;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A11 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Role of Economics; Role of Economists
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rar:journl:0192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask the person in charge to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/rossiea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.