Developing Practice in Healthcare: The Contribution of Bildung to Negotiating the Tensions among Practical, Professional and Organisational Knowing
Action research provides a framework for developing practice in healthcare. While developing practice typically implies a combination of patient centeredness, quality improvement and change, conflicts arise in how concepts such as patient centredness are defined. Developing practice invites attention to positionality and engagement with policy directives, trends in clinical care, and other disciplines each with their own language stratification reflecting particular sets of values and beliefs. Our process of engagement is value-based, requiring attention to different and often conflicting languages or worldviews. We understand practice development as responding to different calls from the system, our individual disciplines, patients and changing discourses in healthcare, each exerting different pressures at different times. This paper describes an action research project aimed at developing nursing practice through engaging with two conflicting philosophies of care. We illustrate the contribution made by a particular understanding of Bildung to engaging with positionality, different voices in healthcare and the context of care in a complex environment. Bildung, as self-cultivation, invites engagement with other as an underpinning for developing practice beginning with first person inquiry. The idea of Bildung drew attention to the local moral world of nursing and the experience of dual citizenship. Dual citizenship reflected engagement with conflicting care philosophies and notions of evidence.
Volume (Year): 8 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/ |
|Order Information:|| Postal: Rainer Hampp Verlag, Journals, Marktplatz 5, 86415 Mering, Germany|
Web: http://www.hampp-verlag.de/hampp_e-journals_IJAR.htm Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rai:ijares:doi_10.1688/1861-9916_ijar_2012_02_hynes. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rainer Hampp)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.