IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pts/journl/y2017i3p51-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative Analysis Of Social Protection In Greece And Romania, Period 2007-2015

Author

Listed:
  • Emilia UNGUREANU

    () (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

  • Florentina Cristina BALDAN

    () (Faculty of Economics and Law, University of Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The paper “Comparative analysis of social protection in Greece and Romania, period 2007-2015” has as main goal to analyze the main actions undertaken by the society in social protection for preventing, diminishing or removing consequences of certain events, considered as “social risks” on the population standard of leaving in the two analyzed countries for the 2007-2015 period.

Suggested Citation

  • Emilia UNGUREANU & Florentina Cristina BALDAN, 2017. "Comparative Analysis Of Social Protection In Greece And Romania, Period 2007-2015," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 16(3), pages 51-60.
  • Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2017:i:3:p:51-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economic.upit.ro/repec/pdf/2017_3_8.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social protection; unemployed; retired; pensions; people with disabilities.;

    JEL classification:

    • J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • E24 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Employment; Unemployment; Wages; Intergenerational Income Distribution; Aggregate Human Capital; Aggregate Labor Productivity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2017:i:3:p:51-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fepitro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.