IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The Accuracy Of Unemployment Rate Forecasts In Romania And The Actual Economic Crisis

Listed author(s):


    (Faculty of Cybernetics, Statistics and Economic Informatics, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

In this study, the problem of forecasts accuracy is analysed on three different forecasting horizons: during the actual economic crisis, in few years before the crisis and on a large horizon. The accuracy of the forecasts made by European Commission, National Commission for Prognosis (NCP) and Institute for Economic Forecasting (IEF) for unemployment rate in Romania is assessed. The most accurate predictions on the forecasting horizons 2001-2011 and 2009-2011 were provided by IEF and the less accurate by NCP. These results were gotten using U1 Theil’s statistic and a new method that has not been used before in literature in this context. The multi-criteria ranking was applied to make a hierarchy of the institutions regarding the accuracy and five important accuracy measures were taken into account at the same time: mean errors, mean squared error, root mean squared error, U1 and U2 statistics of Theil. In few years before crisis (2006-2008) another hierarchy of institutions were gotten using the accuracy criterion: NCP, IEF and EC. The combined forecasts of institutions’ predictions are the best strategy to improve the forecasts accuracy on overall and before the crisis. During the economic crisis IEF provided the most accurate predictions, the combined forecasts being a good strategy of improving only the forecasts made by NCP and EC using inversely MSE scheme and equally weighted scheme. The assessment and improvement of forecasts accuracy have an important contribution in growing the quality of decisional process.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by University of Pitesti in its journal Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences.

Volume (Year): 11 (2012)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 56-67

in new window

Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2012:i:2:p:56-67
Contact details of provider: Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2012:i:2:p:56-67. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.