IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The EU v. Balkan and Eastern European Countries: Unwelcome Neighbours or Potential Members?

Listed author(s):
  • Vassilios GRAMMATIKAS


    (Dept. of Black Sea Studies, Democritus University of Thrace, Komotini, Greece)

Registered author(s):

    Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, as well as the collapse of the communist regimes in the wider Eastern European and former USSR area, almost all of the respective states, looked upon the European Union as the only way of survival of their economies and their fragile democratic systems. U responded in different ways which can be categorized as follows: a)It incorporated the majority of the Eastern European States, through the enlargement process (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Romania) and has entered into accession negotiations with others (Croatia, Turkey). b)It initiated bilateral relations with the Russian Federation as an important partner. c)It developed the ENP and more recently the EaP to institutionalize a process of enhanced economic and political cooperation with the respective states aiming at bringing them closer to the EU, while preparing some of them for future membership, but also offering an alternative solution to certain states that the EU is not willing to offer full membership (Belarus, Moldova, Ukraine, Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan). d)It formulated the Stabilization and Association Process (SAP) specifically designed to meet the needs of the Western Balkan states and gradually incorporate them.The paper explores the institutional and political framework of the abovementioned developments, the potential outcome for the Balkan and eastern European states and the problematic aspects for the EU and the other parties involved.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by University of Pitesti in its journal Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences.

    Volume (Year): 10 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 48-61

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2011:i:2:p:48-61
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pts:journl:y:2011:i:2:p:48-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Logica Banica)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.