IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Faut-il inciter l'offre ou la demande de travail peu qualifié?

Listed author(s):
  • Pierre Cahuc
  • Etienne Lehmann

[eng] Should financial incentives on low skilled jobs favour labour supply or labour demand ? We use dynamical job search matching framework to compare the effects of two policies targeted on low skilled jobs paid at a the minimum wage : reductions of employers' contributions to social security versus reductions of taxes paid by employees such as the « Prime pour l'Emploi ». Our approach integrates simultaneously job search behaviour and frictional unemployment, contrary to previous literature. This type of model allows us to deal with effects of policies on unemployment rate, employment rate and welfare. Our results suggest that reducing employers contributions has larger effects on unemployment rate and unemployment spell, whereas redducing taxes paid by employees has larger effects on participation rates and welfare. [fre] Nous comparons les conséquences de politiques de réduction des charges patronales sur les bas salaires et de politiques d'incitation au travail, du type prime pour l'emploi, dans un modèle dynamique où le chômage frictionne! et les comportements de recherche d'emploi sont explicitement pris en compte, contrairement aux approches plus traditionnelles expliquant le chômage dans un cadre statique. Notre approche permet d'appréhender les conséquences de ces politiques sur le taux de chômage, le taux d'emploi et le bien-être. Nos résultats suggèrent que les réductions de charges patronales sont plus efficaces pour réduire le taux de chômage et sa durée, tandis que les incitations au travail ont les effets les plus importants sur le bien-être des chômeurs et sur les taux d'activité.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 53 (2002)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
Pages: 1305-1327

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_6_410470
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_2002_num_53_6_410470. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.