IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Analyses géométriques et probabilistes des règles de vote, avec une application au scrutin majoritaire à deux tours

Listed author(s):
  • Vincent Merlin
  • Dominique Lepelley

[fre] Analyses géométriques et probabilistes des règles de vote, avec une application au scrutin majoritaire à deux tours La théorie des choix collectifs offre un cadre d'analyse cohérent des différentes procédures de décision. À côté de la démarche axiomatique classique, plusieurs outils d'analyse originaux ont été développés pour étudier les qualités et défauts des principales méthodes de décision. Nous présentons ici ces approches alter­natives, à savoir les outils de l'analyse géométrique et le calcul des probabilités des paradoxes de vote. Les avantages et inconvénients de ces démarches par rapport à l'analyse axiomatique seront discutés. Le vote majoritaire à deux tours servira d'exemple d'application tout au long de notre discussion. [eng] Geometric and probabilistic analysis for voting rules, wtth an application to plurality run-off Social Choice Theory proposes a consistent framework in order to analyse the decision methods. In comparison with the classical axiomatic approach, several original tools have been developped for studying the qualities and the flaws of the main decision processes. We shall present in this paper these alternative approaches, that is the tools of the Geometry of Voting, and the computation of the likelihood of voting paradoxes. The advantages and disadvantages of these approaches compared to the axiomatic analysis will be discussed. Two stage plurality run-off will be taken as an example of application throughout the paper.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Data and metadata provided by Persée are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0" License

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Revue économique.

Volume (Year): 50 (1999)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 699-714

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410114
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:reveco:reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_4_410114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.