IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Natura 2000 : une expertise partagée

  • Elisabeth Remy
Registered author(s):

    [eng] Natura 2000 : debated expertise - The effect of the directive is to make the decision from a scientific point of view reversible because it is always possible to turn back, and, also, to give a frame to certain decisions and to stop the proliferation of debates because it deals with the very elements of nature consolidated by various normative processes. Instead of the fragile balance of any social négociation, the process of identification of sites prescribes a "cognitive frame ".. [fre] L'opération que produit la directive Habitats, à travers une forme de traçabilité des données, c'est d'abord de réversibiliser la décision du point scientifique parce qu'il est toujours possible de revenir sur ses pas; c'est aussi de cadrer certaines décisions et d'arrêter la prolifération des débats parce qu'on parle désormais des choses mêmes de la nature, consolidées par différents processus normatifs. Aux équilibres toujours fragiles de la négociation sociale, la procédure d'identification des sites oppose ainsi un "cadrage cognitif".

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie rurale.

    Volume (Year): 262 (2001)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 19-34

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2001_num_262_1_5229
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2001.5229
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2001_num_262_1_5229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.