IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Natura 2000 : une expertise partagée


  • Elisabeth Remy


[eng] Natura 2000 : debated expertise - The effect of the directive is to make the decision from a scientific point of view reversible because it is always possible to turn back, and, also, to give a frame to certain decisions and to stop the proliferation of debates because it deals with the very elements of nature consolidated by various normative processes. Instead of the fragile balance of any social négociation, the process of identification of sites prescribes a "cognitive frame ".. [fre] L'opération que produit la directive Habitats, à travers une forme de traçabilité des données, c'est d'abord de réversibiliser la décision du point scientifique parce qu'il est toujours possible de revenir sur ses pas; c'est aussi de cadrer certaines décisions et d'arrêter la prolifération des débats parce qu'on parle désormais des choses mêmes de la nature, consolidées par différents processus normatifs. Aux équilibres toujours fragiles de la négociation sociale, la procédure d'identification des sites oppose ainsi un "cadrage cognitif".

Suggested Citation

  • Elisabeth Remy, 2001. "Natura 2000 : une expertise partagée," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 262(1), pages 19-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2001_num_262_1_5229
    Note: DOI:10.3406/ecoru.2001.5229

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Marc Mormont, 1996. "Agriculture et environnement : pour une sociologie des dispositifs," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 236(1), pages 28-36.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recoru:ecoru_0013-0559_2001_num_262_1_5229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.