IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/recofi/ecofi_0987-3368_2011_num_104_4_5908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investissement institutionnel et révision de la directive MIF

Author

Listed:
  • Nathalie Oriol

Abstract

[fre] La directive MIF a conduit à la multiplication des systèmes d’exécution des ordres en Europe. Trois ans après sa mise en place, les effets sont mitigés et amènent à la mise en chantier d’une importante révision. Dans le but d’éclairer les débats réglementaires, cet article étudie les préférences des investisseurs institutionnels en termes de méthodes d’exécution des ordres. Sur la base de données Euronext Paris, l’étude réalisée permet de montrer que la diversification des services de négociation et un certain niveau de fragmentation des flux d’ordres sont justifiés, mais doivent être accompagnés de règles de transparence adaptées. . Classification JEL : G11, G14, G24, L51. [eng] Institutional Investment and MIFID Revision.. MIFID has led to the proliferation of orders execution systems in Europe. Three years after launching, results are subject to discussion and pave the way towards a substantial revision project. In order to throw light on regulatory debate, this paper studies institutional investors’ preferences for order execution methods. Based on Euronext Paris data, the study shows that trading services diversification and a certain degree of order flows fragmentation are justified when accompanied by adapted transparency rules. . Classification JEL : G11, G14, G24, L51.

Suggested Citation

  • Nathalie Oriol, 2011. "Investissement institutionnel et révision de la directive MIF," Revue d'Économie Financière, Programme National Persée, vol. 104(4), pages 217-235.
    • Handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2011_num_104_4_5908
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.persee.fr/doc/ecofi_0987-3368_2011_num_104_4_5908
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nathalie Oriol & Alexandra Rufini & Dominique Torre, 2015. "Should Dark Pools be Banned from Regulated Exchanges?," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:recofi:ecofi_0987-3368_2011_num_104_4_5908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Equipe PERSEE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.persee.fr/collection/ecofi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.