IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Comparaisons de distributions hétérogènes et critères de dominance

Listed author(s):
  • Patrick Moyes

[eng] Comparisons of Heterogeneous Distributions and dominance Criteria by Patrick Moyes This paper looks at standard-of-living comparisons when observations of both income and household structure are available. We generalise the Atkinson and Bourguignon approach (1987) in the case where marginal distributions of needs can vary across the household populations studied. We assume that considerate planners use a utilitarian social welfare function to rank heterogeneous income distributions. Insofar as any individual can play the role of planner, we take the unanimist point of view that the planner's judgements have to comply with a certain number of basic normative principles. We impose increasingly restrictive conditions on the household's utility function and study their effects on the resulting ranking of distributions. This leads us to propose four dominance criteria to be used for an unambiguous ranking of income distributions for heterogeneous populations. [fre] Comparaisons de distributions hétérogènes et critères de dominance par Patrick Moyes Cet article porte sur la comparaison des niveaux de vie lorsque l'on dispose à la fois d'observations sur les revenus et sur la composition des ménages. Nous généralisons l'approche d'Atkinson et Bourguignon (1987) dans le cas où les distributions marginales des besoins peuvent varier entre les populations des ménages considérées. Nous supposons que le planificateur bienveillant a recours à une fonction de bien-être social utilitariste pour classer les distributions de revenus hétérogènes. Dans la mesure où tout individu peut jouer le rôle du planificateur, nous adopterons le point de vue unanimiste suivant lequel les jugements du planificateur doivent se conformer à un certain nombre de principes normatifs élémentaires. Nous imposons des conditions de plus en plus restrictives sur la fonction d'utilité du ménage et examinons leurs conséquences sur le classement des distributions qui en résulte. Ceci nous conduit à proposer quatre critères de dominance permettant de classer sans ambiguïté les distributions de revenu pour des populations hétérogènes.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Article provided by Programme National Persée in its journal Économie & prévision.

Volume (Year): 138 (1999)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 125-146

in new window

Handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963
Note: DOI:10.3406/ecop.1999.5963
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_1999_num_138_2_5963. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Equipe PERSEE)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.