Možnost nadřazení zájmů mateřské společnosti v podnikatelském seskupení
The purpose of this article is to compare laws regulating corporate groups in Germany, the United Kingdom and France in order to find the optimal model of regulation of corporate groups and then to compare the findings with the proposed Commercial Corporation Act. Generally, the difference between the concepts lies in the approach to the issue of respecting or not respecting the duty of loyalty within corporate groups. Under certain conditions, German law enables a parent company to promote interests of the whole group at the expense of a subsidiary. It creates a system of specifi c rules in order to comprehensively regulate such interferences of the parent company and thus to protect the subsidiary. On the other hand, British law insists on compliance with the duty of loyalty and equips minority shareholders and creditors with legal means for their protection. French law represents a compromise between these approaches as it allows promotion of interests of the whole group at the expense of a subsidiary only under strict conditions. However, if these conditions are met, it enables the parent company to promote its interests in an even broader way than German law does. It also provides minority shareholders and creditors with direct protection. In French law on corporate groups, jurisprudence plays an important role which enables a flexible response to developments in the economic sphere. Thus, on the one hand, French law enables the parent company to effectively manage the corporate group as an economic unit and, on the other hand, it provides endangered subjects with functional instruments of protection. For this reason, the French approach can be recommended. The proposed Commercial Corporation Act is inspired by the French model, which can be evaluated as positive.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 2012 (2012)
Issue (Month): 6 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: nam. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3|
Phone: (02) 24 09 51 11
Fax: (02) 24 22 06 57
Web page: http://www.vse.cz/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Postal: Redakce Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, nám. W. Churchilla 4, 130 67 Praha 3|
Web: http://www.vse.cz/aop/ Email:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:prg:jnlaop:v:2012:y:2012:i:6:id:386:p:34-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Frantisek Sokolovsky)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.