IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical Framework Of The Defining Ideas Of The Notion Of "Consumer" From The Perspective Of Directive 93/13/Eec And The Jurisprudence Developed On Its Side


  • Lacrima Bianca LUNTRARU

    (Assistant professor, PhD., George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, ROMANIA.)


TThe evolution of the law on unfair contractual terms contained in contracts concluded with consumers and the change in the function of equity of the contract law of consumer, lead to discussions regarding the approach of the notion "consumer". The consumer, as well as the competition, contributes to the general regulatory objective of the internal market, so that both claim legal provisions to ensure effective protection but also to stimulate economic activity, which leads to the realization of a right of consumption of a hybrid nature, with more severe implications and sanctions. The present paper aims to outline an analytical framework of the defining ideas of this notion, with a special look at the stretch in time, under the auspices of the judicial dialogue between our country and the Court of Justice of the European Union.

Suggested Citation

  • Lacrima Bianca LUNTRARU, 2022. "Analytical Framework Of The Defining Ideas Of The Notion Of "Consumer" From The Perspective Of Directive 93/13/Eec And The Jurisprudence Developed On Its Side," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 91, pages 26-34, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:91:y:2022:p:26-34

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    consumer; professional; C.J.E.U. jurisprudence; contractual justice; unfair terms.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K12 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Contract Law


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:91:y:2022:p:26-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.