IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Considerations Regarding The Powers Of The President Of Romania Considered In Terms Of The Jurisdiction Of The Constitutional Court


  • Daniela Cristina VALEA

    (Assoc. prof. PhD., University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, Departament of Law and Public Administration; lawyer, Mures Barr Association, ROMANIA.)


According to a recent decision (issued on 30 May 2018 ), the Romanian Constitutional Court intervened by resolving a prospected constitutional conflict, occasion which determined mutations in one of the powers of the Head of the State provided by the Romanian Constitution (appointment/revocation of Prosecutors - Article 94 letter c) and Article 133 para. 1 of the Constitution of Romania republished). It is not the only intervention of the Constitutional Court in Romania that configures/reconfigures the institution of the Head of State. In this paper, we intend to address only those decisions issued by the Constitutional Court in the exercise of its powers to resolve the constitutional conflicts between authorities (Article 142 letter e) decisions of the Romanian Constitution, which, in our opinion, have the greatest impact in terms of reconfiguring the position of the President of Romania, and tangentially the reconfiguration even of the type of government and the political regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Cristina VALEA, 2018. "Some Considerations Regarding The Powers Of The President Of Romania Considered In Terms Of The Jurisdiction Of The Constitutional Court," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 74, pages 27-36, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:27-36

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Head of State; Constitutional Court of Romania; constitutional conflict; attributions;

    JEL classification:

    • K - Law and Economics
    • K - Law and Economics


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:74:y:2018:p:27-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.