IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Possible Effects On The Arbitration Agreement Determined By The Anticipated Non-Payment Of The Costs Ordered By The Arbitration Tribunal To The Parties


  • Ximena MOLDOVAN

    (Lawyer, Assistant, PhD. "Petru Maior" University of Tirgu Mures, Faculty of Economics, Law and Administrative Sciences, ROMANIA.)


Particular to the alternative private jurisdiction represented by the arbitration, is the fact that the litigant parties, in accordance to the arbitration agreement can establish derogatory provisions from the common law, in determined conditions. The start of the arbitration procedure, gives the right to the arbitration tribunal, without creating a previous imperative condition in its charge, to force the parties, or each one of these, to pay any expenses needed for the organizationd and deployment of the arbitration. If the parties don`t respect the tribunal`s order, the arbitration tribunal can refuse to solve the arbitration case, until the parties will deposit or will pay on advance the costs, the provisions of the Civil procedure code not making a mention about the concrete method of the settlement of the litigation “delaying” or about the maximum period in which the arbitration litigation file can be delayed. The question that rises is if a state of passivity of the parties, in relation to the orders given by the arbitration tribunal and relative to the provisions of the arbitration agreement, cannot be considered a tacit common motion to withdraw to this alternative jurisdiction?

Suggested Citation

  • Ximena MOLDOVAN, 2018. "Possible Effects On The Arbitration Agreement Determined By The Anticipated Non-Payment Of The Costs Ordered By The Arbitration Tribunal To The Parties," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 72, pages 184-191, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:184-191

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    arbitration procedure; agreement; arbitration tribunal; anticipated payment; motion to withdraw.;

    JEL classification:

    • K49 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Other


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:72:y:2018:p:184-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.