IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Alternative Methods For The Resolution Of Trade Disputes

Listed author(s):
  • Gabriel MIHAI

    (Associate Professor, PhD The Faculty of Law and Administrative Sciences Ovidius University of Constanta, Commercial arbitrator – The Court of Commercial Arbitration of Constanta, ROMANIA.)

Registered author(s):

    The domain of alternative trade dispute resolution provides a wide field of mechanisms and procedures designed to facilitate the optimal dispute resolution in a creative and effective way, without the intervention of courts, by using a rich range of procedures. All extra-judicial means of resolving commercial disputes, from the pure and simple transaction to mediation, conciliation and arbitration, are based on the agreement of parties. Traders need to get rid of the statist mentality that only supports state intervention in resolving disputes and to embrace alternative ways of resolving these conflicts, which are more flexible, faster and cheaper and which must be taken in this context of new socio-economic conditions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 50 (2012)
    Issue (Month): (December)
    Pages: 81-90

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:50:y:2012:p:81-90
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:50:y:2012:p:81-90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.