IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v47y2011p45-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legislative Reform Of The European Union Introduced By The Treaty Of Lisbon

Author

Listed:
  • Judit FAZEKAS

    (Professor of European Law,PhD., University of Miskolc, Faculty of Law, Department of European Law and Private International Law, HUNGARY.)

Abstract

The aim of the reforms introduced by the Treaty of Lisbon was to simplify and make more transparent the system of Union legal sources and that of the decision-making procedures. This paper examines that how the system of Union legal sources and that of the previous legislative and decision-making procedures were modified and changed with the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon. The study also deals with the question whether the European Union has progressed due to the new legal system or not, that is to say whether the objectives of making the legal system of the European Union more simple and more transparency as set out in the Laeken Declaration have been achieved or not.

Suggested Citation

  • Judit FAZEKAS, 2011. "Legislative Reform Of The European Union Introduced By The Treaty Of Lisbon," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 47, pages 45-60, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:45-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj11/recjurid114_2F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Treaty of Lisbon; legislative reform; legal acts; legal sources of the EU; legislative acts; delegated acts; implementing acts; comitology; legislative procedures; simplification; transparency of decision-making procedures;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K00 - Law and Economics - - General - - - General (including Data Sources and Description)
    • K - Law and Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:45-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.