IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Considerations On The Judiciary Procedures Of Conflict Resolution



    (Assistant professor, PhD., „Romanian American” University, Bucharest, ROMANIA.)


As a result of the economic and social life development, which triggers an ever larger number of litigations in all the fields, and which have to be solved at an ever faster pace, at the level of the European Union, it is incumbent to find the simplest and quickest judiciary procedures, the European Union member states having to adopt them. The practice showed that the judiciary procedure through which the creditors became to have their rights acknowledged and ask for the pursuance and execution of their debts is, many times, discouraging, it is much more expensive and it takes an extremely long time. The demand for payment is meant, on the one hand, to place the creditor in a much more comfortable position, as compared to his rights, and, on the other hand, to reduce, to a considerable extent, the length of valorization of an uncontested, liquid and enforceable debt, consisting in paying an amount of currency.

Suggested Citation

  • George MÃGUREANU POPTEAN, 2011. "Considerations On The Judiciary Procedures Of Conflict Resolution," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 47, pages 237-246, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:237-246

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    special procedure; demand for payment; uncontested debt; liquid debt; enforceable debt; petition for annulment.;

    JEL classification:

    • K41 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior - - - Litigation Process


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:47:y:2011:p:237-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.