IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Theoretical And Practical Aspects Regarding Some Consequences Of The Annulment Of The Dismissal Decision Ordered By The Employer

Listed author(s):
  • Romulus Gidro

    („Petru Maior” University at Târgu-Mureş)

  • Aurelia Gidro

    („Bogdan-Vodă” University at Cluj-Napoca)

Registered author(s):

    The authors carry out an assessment of the effects of cancelling or annulling of a dismissal decision issued by the employer. The Romanian legal doctrine reveals the fact that the provisions of art.78 par., 1 and 2 of Labor Code, as they are worded, pose much difficulty in the practice of reinstatement as they pave the way to differing interpretations and jurisprudence lacking unity. As reinstatement is of utmost importance following the annulment of an illegal or unfair dismissal, several opinions have popped up; thus, there were suggested solutions to certain practical cases which –to a large extent—are analysed in the material at hand. The final conclusion is that the lawmaker has necessarily to intervene with new statutes; some of the lege ferenda doctrinaire proposals are to be discerned in what will follow. According to the Employment Legislation, following the dismissal of an employee, there can come up two situations leading to the cancellation of the aftermath of the dismissal ordered by the employer. The first one may be the cancellation of the decision and, the second is represented by its annulment altogether.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 43 (2010)
    Issue (Month): (December)
    Pages: 114-124

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:43:y:2010:p:114-124
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:43:y:2010:p:114-124. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.