IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La Passation Du Contrat Individuel De Travail- Conditions Specifiques De Validite -

Listed author(s):
  • Aurelia GIDRO

    (Chargé de cours,Université Bogdan Voda, Cluj- Napoca)

  • Romulus GIDRO

    (Professeur des universities, Université Petru Maior, Targu Mures)

  • Vasile NISTOR

    (Juriste, Conseiller en ressources humaines, Mairie de Gilãu)

Registered author(s):

    The Conclusion of an employment contract involves, as usually, the examination of certain preliminary stages: the request for information, negotiation, etc., but also the fulfillment of certain conditions as without it the fundamental legal act cannot be validated. In the Romanian legal doctrine, the conditions regarding the conclusion of the individual employment contract are classified in several categories and according to various criteria. The authors have adopted a dual classification, which imposes the enforcement of two broad categories of conditions: general and common conditions for all contracts and specific conditions within the individual employment contract. This paper aims to analyze the specific conditions of validity, expressing certain critical observations on both the existing regulations and the opinions of other authors.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 41 (2010)
    Issue (Month): (June)
    Pages: 82-98

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:41:y:2010:p:82-98
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:41:y:2010:p:82-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.