IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pmu/cjurid/v41y2010p32-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Les Competences Du Juge Constitutionnel Roumain

Author

Listed:
  • Mircea CRISTE

    (Professeur des universites, docteur en droit, Faculte de droit et sciences administratives de l'Universite d'Ouest, Timisoara, Roumanie)

Abstract

The law review, as it was organized in Romania by the constitutional power in 1923 and 1991, is a concentrated control. Entrusted by the Constitution of 1923 in Plenum of the highest Court, it is according to the current Constitution to a special and specialized body, largely inspired by the European model of the constitutional courts. By choosing the European model, the Constitutional Court has strengthened skills relative to what it had in the period before the war. These are mostly skills in the political field, determined by the fact that the Constitutional Court is a judicial-political body. On the other hand, while the law review existing under the Constitution of 1923 was a posterior control, the Court exercises both a posteriori control as a priori. The study presents in a comparative perspective the competences of these two constitutional jurisdictions, proposing a classification which takes into consideration the nature of the constitutional instance.

Suggested Citation

  • Mircea CRISTE, 2010. "Les Competences Du Juge Constitutionnel Roumain," Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current, Le Courant Juridique, Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation, vol. 41, pages 32-43, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:41:y:2010:p:32-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.upm.ro/facultati_departamente/ea/RePEc/curentul_juridic/rcj10/recjurid102_3F.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    : constitutional jurisdiction; law review; a posteriori control; a priori control.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
    • K39 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:41:y:2010:p:32-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan Voaidas (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feuttro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.