IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

About the judicial status of concession contract in the contemporary Romanian law

Listed author(s):


    (“Transilvania” University of Brasov, Romania)

Registered author(s):

    The topic of this article is one of the species of the lease contract, that is the lease contract having as lessor the state, a country or a city (a public-law legal entity), as it is defined by the Romanian Law. The article debates this matter in a comprehensive, quasi exhaustive manner, starting with the historical evolution and the legal nature of this kind of contracts. Nowadays, the applicable law in this field is Law no. 219/1998 regarding the lease, which sets out: the parties entitled to conclude such a contract, the legal effects of the contract (that is, all the rights and obligations deriving for both parties), and the reasons – both general and particular – that cause the case of a lease contract. The author suggests not as public/law acts only, but – more adequate with their properties - as contractual type of acts, having as main purpose the administration of the public or private domain of the state or its components.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Petru Maior University, Faculty of Economics Law and Administrative Sciences and Pro Iure Foundation in its journal Curentul Juridic, The Juridical Current.

    Volume (Year): 16-17 (2004)
    Issue (Month): (June)
    Pages: 38-65

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:16-17:y:2004:p:38-65
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pmu:cjurid:v:16-17:y:2004:p:38-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bogdan Voaidas)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.