IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/ppat00/1012554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhanced quantitation of pathological α-synuclein in patient biospecimens by RT-QuIC seed amplification assays

Author

Listed:
  • Ankit Srivastava
  • Qinlu Wang
  • Christina D Orrù
  • Manel Fernandez
  • Yaroslau Compta
  • Bernardino Ghetti
  • Gianluigi Zanusso
  • Wen-Quan Zou
  • Byron Caughey
  • Catherine A A Beauchemin

Abstract

Disease associated pathological aggregates of alpha-synuclein (αSynD) exhibit prion-like spreading in synucleinopathies such as Parkinson’s disease (PD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). Seed amplification assays (SAAs) such as real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) have shown high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for detecting proteopathic αSynD seeds in a variety of biospecimens from PD and DLB patients. However, the extent to which relative proteopathic seed concentrations are useful as indices of a patient’s disease stage or prognosis remains unresolved. One feature of current SAAs that complicates attempts to correlate SAA results with patients’ clinical and other laboratory findings is their quantitative imprecision, which has typically been limited to discriminating large differences (e.g. 5–10 fold) in seed concentration. We used end-point dilution (ED) RT-QuIC assays to determine αSynD seed concentrations in patient biospecimens and tested the influence of various assay variables such as serial dilution factor, replicate number and data processing methods. The use of 2-fold versus 10-fold dilution factors and 12 versus 4 replicate reactions per dilution reduced ED-RT-QuIC assay error by as much as 70%. This enhanced assay format discriminated as little as 2-fold differences in αSynD seed concentration besides detecting ~2-16-fold seed reductions caused by inactivation treatments. In some scenarios, analysis of the data using Poisson and midSIN algorithms provided more consistent and statistically significant discrimination of different seed concentrations. We applied our improved assay strategies to multiple diagnostically relevant PD and DLB antemortem patient biospecimens, including cerebrospinal fluid, skin, and brushings of the olfactory mucosa. Using ED αSyn RT-QuIC as a model SAA, we show how to markedly improve the inter-assay reproducibility and quantitative accuracy. Enhanced quantitative SAA accuracy should facilitate assessments of pathological seeding activities as biomarkers in proteinopathy diagnostics and prognostics, as well as in patient cohort selection and assessments of pharmacodynamics and target engagement in drug trials.Author summary: Seed amplification assays (SAAs) such as RT-QuIC detect pathological α-Syn aggregates with prion-like self-propagating (seeding) activity from various tissue biospecimens of synucleinopathy patients. However, clinical applications of current SAAs to neurodegenerative diseases can be hampered by their quantitative imprecision in stratifying levels of pathological seeds as biomarkers. In this study, we tested the influence of various assay variables including dilution factor, number of replicates, and quantitation methods in end-point dilution RT-QuIC (ED RT-QuIC) using PD and DLB patient samples, specifically brain tissue, CSF, skin, and nasal brushings. Our study highlights how assay design can markedly improve seed quantification in clinical samples. Better proteopathic seed quantification should enable more precise evaluation of pathological seeding activity to support important clinical and research applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Ankit Srivastava & Qinlu Wang & Christina D Orrù & Manel Fernandez & Yaroslau Compta & Bernardino Ghetti & Gianluigi Zanusso & Wen-Quan Zou & Byron Caughey & Catherine A A Beauchemin, 2024. "Enhanced quantitation of pathological α-synuclein in patient biospecimens by RT-QuIC seed amplification assays," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(9), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1012554
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1012554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1012554&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Cresta & Donald C Warren & Christian Quirouette & Amanda P Smith & Lindey C Lane & Amber M Smith & Catherine A A Beauchemin, 2021. "Time to revisit the endpoint dilution assay and to replace the TCID50 as a measure of a virus sample’s infection concentration," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1012554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plospathogens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.