IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/ppat00/1012119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adaptive immune response to Trichuris in wild versus laboratory mice: An established model system in context

Author

Listed:
  • Iris Mair
  • Jonathan Fenn
  • Andrew Wolfenden
  • Ann E Lowe
  • Alex Bennett
  • Andrew Muir
  • Jacob Thompson
  • Olive Dieumerci
  • Larisa Logunova
  • Susanne Shultz
  • Janette E Bradley
  • Kathryn J Else

Abstract

Laboratory model organisms have provided a window into how the immune system functions. An increasing body of evidence, however, suggests that the immune responses of naive laboratory animals may differ substantially to those of their wild counterparts. Past exposure, environmental challenges and physiological condition may all impact on immune responsiveness. Chronic infections of soil-transmitted helminths, which we define as establishment of adult, fecund worms, impose significant health burdens on humans, livestock and wildlife, with limited treatment success. In laboratory mice, Th1 versus Th2 immune polarisation is the major determinant of helminth infection outcome. Here we compared antigen-specific immune responses to the soil-transmitted whipworm Trichuris muris between controlled laboratory and wild free-ranging populations of house mice (Mus musculus domesticus). Wild mice harbouring chronic, low-level infections produced lower levels of cytokines in response to Trichuris antigen than laboratory-housed C57BL/6 mice. Wild mouse effector/memory CD4+ T cell phenotype reflected the antigen-specific cytokine response across the Th1/Th2 spectrum. Increasing egg shedding was associated with body condition loss. However, local Trichuris-specific Th1/Th2 balance was positively associated with worm burden only in older wild mice. Thus, although the fundamental relationships between the CD4+ T helper cell response and resistance to T. muris infection are similar in both laboratory and wild M. m. domesticus, there are quantitative differences and age-specific effects that are analogous to human immune responses. These context-dependent immune responses demonstrate the fundamental importance of understanding the differences between model and natural systems for translating mechanistic models to ‘real world’ immune function.Author summary: Most knowledge of immune responses to parasitic infection stems from controlled laboratory mouse models. We found that adaptive immune responses to Trichuris muris under natural conditions are not fully reflected by laboratory infection models employing a single bolus of high or low egg doses. Whilst the Th1/Th2 paradigm persists in the wild, immune responses are dampened compared to laboratory mice. Further, we reveal that in wild mice, worm burden is only explained by the immune response in older, but not younger mice, a pattern previously observed in humans but not laboratory mice. By studying immune responses in a wild system, we can expand our well-established laboratory disease models to reflect the real world and enhance their utility for biomedical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Iris Mair & Jonathan Fenn & Andrew Wolfenden & Ann E Lowe & Alex Bennett & Andrew Muir & Jacob Thompson & Olive Dieumerci & Larisa Logunova & Susanne Shultz & Janette E Bradley & Kathryn J Else, 2024. "The adaptive immune response to Trichuris in wild versus laboratory mice: An established model system in context," PLOS Pathogens, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1012119
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1012119
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1012119&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.ppat.1012119?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen Abolins & Elizabeth C. King & Luke Lazarou & Laura Weldon & Louise Hughes & Paul Drescher & John G. Raynes & Julius C. R. Hafalla & Mark E. Viney & Eleanor M. Riley, 2017. "The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-13, August.
    2. repec:plo:pbio00:1001901 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rani Lill Anjum & Elena Rocca, 2019. "From Ideal to Real Risk: Philosophy of Causation Meets Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(3), pages 729-740, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:ppat00:1012119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plospathogens (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.