IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0354964.html

An ecosyndemic framework for understanding obesity: Spatial clustering of health, environmental and socioeconomic disadvantage in the Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Mirthe Muilwijk
  • Yvonne T van der Schouw
  • Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong
  • Rimke C Vos
  • Marco R Spruit
  • Jonah J Stunt
  • Marielle A Beenackers
  • Stefan Pichler
  • Thao M Lam
  • Jeroen Lakerveld
  • Ilonca Vaartjes

Abstract

Introduction: Obesity and related health conditions are unevenly distributed across neighborhoods, often co-occuring with multiple health challenges and socioeconomic disadvantages. Using an ecosyndemic framework, which integrates ecological and social dimensions that contribute to the clustering of health problems, this study examines how adverse obesity-related health outcomes spatially cluster in relation to obesogenic environments and socioeconomic position (SEP) across Dutch neighborhoods. Methods: Nationwide neighborhood-level data on health outcomes, obesogenic environmental exposures (food environment, walkability, drivability, bikeability, sports facilities), and SEP were combined for all inhabited Dutch administrative neighborhoods in 2016 (N = 12,420). Cluster analysis was used to identify distinct neighborhood profiles and descriptive statistics to characterize each cluster, with spatial patterns visualized using an interactive heatmap and principal component plots. Results: Five neighborhood clusters were identified. The ‘Ecosyndemic cluster’ (N = 1,070 neighborhoods) exhibited the highest burden of obesity (17% [IQR 16;19]), chronic diseases (36% [IQR 33;38%]) and risk of anxiety/depression (55% [IQR 51;58]), unhealthy food environments and low SEP. In contrast, the ‘Privileged cluster’ (N = 6,425) had more favorable health outcomes and living conditions, including lower obesity prevalence (12% [IQR 11;14]). The ‘Psychosocial Vulnerability cluster’ (N = 991) was notable for elevated risk of anxiety/depression (47% [IQR 43;51]) combined with relatively low obesity (11% [IQR 8;12]). The ‘Syndemic cluster’ (N = 1,836; obesity 15% [IQR 14;17]) and ‘Towards Privileged cluster’ (N = 2,098; obesity 12% [IQR 10;13]) represented intermediate profiles. Conclusion: Obesity and related health issues frequently cluster with unfavorable environment and SEP at the neighborhood level. The ecosyndemic framework offers a novel approach for identifying high-risk areas and supports targeted, social and place-based interventions.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirthe Muilwijk & Yvonne T van der Schouw & Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong & Rimke C Vos & Marco R Spruit & Jonah J Stunt & Marielle A Beenackers & Stefan Pichler & Thao M Lam & Jeroen Lakerveld & Ilonca Va, 2026. "An ecosyndemic framework for understanding obesity: Spatial clustering of health, environmental and socioeconomic disadvantage in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(8), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354964
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0354964
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354964
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0354964&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0354964?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0354964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.