IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0344123.html

“It becomes more difficult when people don’t empathize with us”: COVID-19-related stigmatization experienced by survivors in Nepal

Author

Listed:
  • Buna Bhandari
  • Poshan Thapa
  • Amit Timilsina
  • Rajiv Ranjan Karn
  • Haider Ali
  • Ashley Hagaman
  • Archana Shrestha

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic caused widespread social disruption, with stigma emerging as a significant challenge for individuals who survived infection. This qualitative study explored the forms, drivers, and impacts of COVID-19-related stigma among survivors in Eastern Nepal. In-depth interviews were conducted with 15 COVID-19 survivors who had reported stigma in a preceding cross-sectional survey. Due to pandemic-related restrictions, interviews were conducted over the phone. Data were analysed thematically following the process outlined by Braun and Clarke. COVID-19 stigma was multifaceted, including social rejection, internalized stigma, and discriminatory practices by community members. Key drivers of stigma included self-directed fear of infection and death, misinformation and limited awareness about COVID-19 transmission and prevention, and a fragile health system and policy responses. Although COVID-19-related stigma may have declined as the pandemic evolved, the findings illustrate how stigma can emerge rapidly during health emergencies that can have social consequences related to trust, disclosure, and help-seeking behavior in future crisis. The study highlights the importance of outbreak preparedness strategies that integrate clear communication, strengthened health system capacity, and social protection measures to mitigate stigma and its harms during future public health crises.

Suggested Citation

  • Buna Bhandari & Poshan Thapa & Amit Timilsina & Rajiv Ranjan Karn & Haider Ali & Ashley Hagaman & Archana Shrestha, 2026. "“It becomes more difficult when people don’t empathize with us”: COVID-19-related stigmatization experienced by survivors in Nepal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(3), pages 1-14, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344123
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344123
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344123
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344123&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0344123?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craddock, Susan, 1995. "Sewers and scapegoats: Spatial metaphors of smallpox in nineteenth century San Francisco," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(7), pages 957-968, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence, Jody & Kearns, Robin A. & Park, Julie & Bryder, Linda & Worth, Heather, 2008. "Discourses of disease: Representations of tuberculosis within New Zealand newspapers 2002-2004," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 727-739, February.
    2. Smith-Morris, Carolyn, 2017. "Epidemiological placism in public health emergencies: Ebola in two Dallas neighborhoods," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 106-114.
    3. Eichelberger, Laura, 2007. "SARS and New York's Chinatown: The politics of risk and blame during an epidemic of fear," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(6), pages 1284-1295, September.
    4. Javier A. Birchenall, 2025. "Plague and prejudice: disease, discrimination, and social exclusion," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 80(1), pages 381-415, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0344123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.