IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0342945.html

Gallstone disease classification using SLOA-optimized CatBoost classifier with explainable AI

Author

Listed:
  • Prosenjit Das
  • Md Ayaj Uddin Khan
  • Proshenjit Sarker
  • Abdullah-Al Nahid

Abstract

Gallstones are small stones that form in the gallbladder. Around 80% of individuals with gallstones do not present any symptoms. Despite the high accuracy of image-based machine learning (ML) models in the detection of gallstones, less research has been carried out regarding tabular data. This paper has discussed a publicly available tabular dataset in order to study some predictive models to determine the presence of gallstones. We have employed the Catboost (CB) classifier model and the Sea Lion Optimization Algorithm (SLOA) in our study. In this project, the primary methods that are explored include CatBoost with cross-validation and CB optimized using the SLOA with cross-validation. The CB model techniques using 5-fold cross-validation have attained a mean accuracy of 79.58%, a mean F1-score of 79.01%, a mean precision of 80.91%, and a mean recall of 77.36% using a total of 38 features. In particular, fold-1 has attained an accuracy of 86.46%, F1-score 85.39%, precision of 88.37%, and recall of 82.61% among the 5-fold cross-validation of the CB model. In addition, the SLOA_CB model of 5-fold cross-validation has achieved a mean accuracy of 80.42%, a mean F1-score of 79.94%, a mean precision of 81.97%, and a mean recall of 77.76%, using the 19 selected features. In this case, fold-4 has attained an accuracy of 87.50%, F1-score, precision, and recall of 87.23%, which implies that the classification performance is balanced. Lastly, SHAP, LIME, and DiCE have been applied to the model explainability, and the most influential features in all cases, regarding the prediction of gallstone disease, are C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Vitamin D.

Suggested Citation

  • Prosenjit Das & Md Ayaj Uddin Khan & Proshenjit Sarker & Abdullah-Al Nahid, 2026. "Gallstone disease classification using SLOA-optimized CatBoost classifier with explainable AI," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(6), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342945
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0342945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0342945&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0342945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yan Zhang & Lin Chen & Yixiang Tian, 2025. "A Method for Evaluating the Interpretability of Machine Learning Models in Predicting Bond Default Risk Based on LIME and SHAP," Papers 2502.19615, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yi Lu & Aifan Ling & Chaoqun Wang & Yaxin Xu, 2025. "Why Bonds Fail Differently? Explainable Multimodal Learning for Multi-Class Default Prediction," Papers 2509.10802, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0342945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.