IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0337934.html

Economic valuation of farmland using natural-attribute–based indicators: A case study of Hefei, China

Author

Listed:
  • Li Yuan
  • Xun Fan
  • Binrui Feng

Abstract

The economic valuation of farmland traditionally focuses on market-based approaches, potentially undervaluing the fundamental role of natural attributes. This study aims to assess the economic value of farmland by explicitly integrating key natural attributes, including soil fertility, slope, and climatic conditions. This study develops a novel assessment framework integrating natural attributes to determine farmland economic value, with Hefei, China as the case study. The assessment combines three methods: the Comprehensive Farmland Quality Index to classify farmland by quality, the Thornthwaite-Mather model to estimate effective precipitation and water availability, and the soil productivity potential method to calculate baseline productive capacity. Together, these methods provide an objective, reproducible, and ecologically grounded basis for farmland valuation. The results reveal the economic value of farmland in Hefei. Key findings include: In 2021, the total area of farmland in Hefei was 481,500 hectares, with approximately 5% classified as first-grade land, 10% as second-grade land, 19% as third-grade land, 32% as fourth-grade land, and 33% as fifth-grade land. The estimated standard production potential per unit of farmland in 2021, from highest to lowest, was 10.28 t·hm−2, 9.94 t·hm−2, 9.31 t·hm−2, 8.91 t·hm−2, and 7.95 t·hm−2 for first- to fifth-grade land, respectively. Based on rice production inputs and outputs, the estimated economic value reflects a single-year, non-discounted theoretical output. The economic total value of farmland in Hefei in 2021 was calculated to be 1.363 billion yuan. Specifically, the economic value of first-grade farmland was 81 million yuan; second-grade farmland was 158 million yuan; third-grade farmland was 273 million yuan; fourth-grade farmland was 444 million yuan; and fifth-grade farmland was 407 million yuan. Among all districts of Hefei, the economic value of farmland in 2021 ranked from highest to lowest as follows: Chaohu, Feidong, Feixi, Lujiang, Shushan, Yaohai, Luyang, and Baohe.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Yuan & Xun Fan & Binrui Feng, 2025. "Economic valuation of farmland using natural-attribute–based indicators: A case study of Hefei, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(12), pages 1-26, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337934
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0337934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337934
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0337934&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0337934?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Harris, Nathaniel, 2024. "Measuring aggregate land values using individual city land value gradients," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0337934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.