Author
Listed:
- Madeline Chandler
- Jasmin A Darville
- Stephanie M Eick
Abstract
Background: Abortion is a continually debated legislative issue in the United States. We aimed to assess opinions toward abortion access amongst reproductive age adult women in Georgia, a state where abortion is banned after the detection of embryonic cardiac activity (around 6 weeks). Methods: Participants were enrolled in the cross-sectional Policies and Social Stress (PASS) Study (N = 177). Sociodemographic characteristics, political orientation, religious characteristics, county of residence, and abortion views were assessed using self-reported questionnaires. Regarding abortion views, participants were asked about their opinion on the legality of abortion generally, and at 6, 14, and 24 weeks. We used logistic regression to examine whether sociodemographic factors, political orientation, religious characteristics, and county of residence were associated with odds of thinking abortion should be legal or illegal for each weeks’ gestation. Results: Most participants (84%) reported supporting the legality of abortion in all or most cases. Though, that support decreased for specific weeks’ gestation (6 Weeks: 76%; 14 Weeks: 60%; 24 Weeks: 31%). Conservatives and moderates had higher odds of thinking abortion should be generally illegal compared to liberals (odds ratio [OR]=10.2, 95% confidence interval [CI]=4.1–27.3). Those who attended religious services more often and those who resided outside of the Atlanta area were more likely to believe abortion should be illegal compared to reference groups (OR=7.2, 95% CI = 3.0–17.9; OR=6.0, 95% CI = 2.5–16.3, respectively). However, the differences between groups attenuated as the weeks of pregnancy increased. Conclusions: In a sample of reproductive age women in Georgia, we observed that opinions regarding the legality of abortion were nuanced with regards to gestational age. Fewer participants supported abortion access after fetal viability (i.e., around 24 weeks). Further, attitudes differed mostly along political, religious, and geographic lines. Implications: While 76% of adult women in our sample supported abortion access at six weeks of pregnancy, less than one-third supported abortion at 24 weeks of pregnancy. These findings suggest that Georgia’s state policy that limits abortion after six weeks’ gestation does not reflect the views of the women in our sample.
Suggested Citation
Madeline Chandler & Jasmin A Darville & Stephanie M Eick, 2025.
"Determinants of abortion views among reproductive age women in Georgia 2023–2024,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(11), pages 1-10, November.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0335370
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335370
Download full text from publisher
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
- Biggs, M. Antonia & Becker, Andréa & Schroeder, Rosalyn & Kaller, Shelly & Scott, Karen & Grossman, Daniel & Raifman, Sarah & Ralph, Lauren, 2024.
"Support for criminalization of self-managed abortion (SMA): A national representative survey,"
Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335370. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.