IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0335052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatic, quasi-experimental, pseudo-randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of patient safety monitors on clinical and patient safety outcomes: The Akershus Clinical Trial (ACT) 1

Author

Listed:
  • Kristian Berge
  • Torbjørn Wisløff
  • Kristine Lippestad
  • Rune Bruhn Jakobsen
  • Johanna A Gjestland
  • Olav Lenvik
  • Haldor Husby
  • Magnus N Lyngbakken
  • Inge Skråmm
  • Helge Røsjø

Abstract

Background: The Norwegian National Action Plan for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement recommends implementing electronic patient safety monitors (PSM) in Norwegian hospitals. We hypothesized that PSM implementation would reduce hospital length of stay, with secondary endpoints related to clinical and patient safety outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective single-center, pragmatic, quasi-experimental, pseudo-randomized controlled trial assessing differences in endpoints for patients admitted before (control group: years 2019–2020) and after PSM implementation (intervention group: years 2021–2022) in two orthopedic bays in a Norwegian teaching hospital. To account for temporal changes unrelated to PSM, we assessed the same endpoints for 2019–2020 vs. 2021–2022 in two orthopedic bays that did not implement PSM. Data extraction from the local data warehouse was controlled according to internal standards, and we predefined all statistical analyses. Results: The intervention group (n = 2786) and the control group (n = 2610) were evenly distributed for baseline characteristics, including age (median 73 [quartile 1–3 55–83] vs. 72 [55–83] years, p = 0.29), female sex (76.2% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.96), and Charlson Comorbidity Index (p = 0.24). Median hospital length of stay was 4.4 (2.1–7.7) days after implementation of PSM compared to 4.3 (2.0–7.2) days in the control group (p = 0.046 for difference between the groups). Nutritional screening and fall screening within 24 hours were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group, while medical reconciliation during the hospital stay was higher in the intervention group. We found no differences between the groups in 30-day or 1-year readmission or mortality rates. Hospital length of stay was similar in 2021–2022 vs. 2019–2020 for the bays that did not implement PSM. Conclusion: The implementation of PSMs in this study did not improve clinical or patient safety outcomes. Hospital length of stay was statistically longer after PSM implementation, although the difference was not clinically relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Kristian Berge & Torbjørn Wisløff & Kristine Lippestad & Rune Bruhn Jakobsen & Johanna A Gjestland & Olav Lenvik & Haldor Husby & Magnus N Lyngbakken & Inge Skråmm & Helge Røsjø, 2025. "Pragmatic, quasi-experimental, pseudo-randomized clinical trial to assess the impact of patient safety monitors on clinical and patient safety outcomes: The Akershus Clinical Trial (ACT) 1," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(10), pages 1-11, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335052
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0335052&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0335052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sahar Hassani & Anja Schou Lindman & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Oliver Tomic & Jon Helgeland, 2015. "30-Day Survival Probabilities as a Quality Indicator for Norwegian Hospitals: Data Management and Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandesh Pantha & Martin Jones & Nompilo Moyo & Bijaya Pokhrel & Diana Kushemererwa & Richard Gray, 2024. "Association between the Quantity of Nurse–Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(4), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Jon Helgeland & Doris Tove Kristoffersen & Katrine Damgaard Skyrud & Anja Schou Lindman, 2016. "Variation between Hospitals with Regard to Diagnostic Practice, Coding Accuracy, and Case-Mix. A Retrospective Validation Study of Administrative Data versus Medical Records for Estimating 30-Day Mort," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Nilsen, Sara Marie & Asheim, Andreas & Carlsen, Fredrik & Anthun, Kjartan Sarheim & Vatten, Lars Johan & Aam, Stina & Davies, Neil M & Bjørngaard, Johan Håkon, 2022. "How do busy hospital circumstances affect mortality and readmission within 60 days: A cohort study of 680 000 acute admissions in Norway," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 808-815.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0335052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.