Author
Abstract
Cryptocurrency markets are characterized by high volatility and behavioral biases. Although several studies have examined psychological, social, and technological factors separately, few have comprehensively integrated them within a unified framework based on behavioral finance. This study addresses this gap by examining the interplay among digital financial literacy, impulsivity, social media financial influencers, fintech self-efficacy, and attitude toward investment in shaping investment decisions in Vietnam’s cryptocurrency market. Data were collected from 505 individual investors, and partial least squares structural equation modeling was employed to test the proposed framework. The results indicate that digital financial literacy fosters positive attitudes toward investment and directly supports informed investment decision-making. However, contrary to conventional expectations, digital financial literacy is positively associated with impulsivity-related investment behavior, suggesting that higher perceived digital competence may foster overconfidence and an illusion of control in highly volatile cryptocurrency markets. Social media financial influencers significantly shape investors’ attitudes and also exert a direct influence on investment decisions, highlighting both attitudinal and behavioral pathways. Furthermore, fintech self-efficacy moderates the relationship between attitudes and investment decisions by reducing investors’ reliance on attitudinal cues when making investment choices. The findings highlight the importance of distinguishing rapid informed decision-making from affect-driven impulsivity and emphasize the role of overconfidence and perceived digital literacy in shaping investor behavior. Practically, the results call for targeted digital financial education and regulatory oversight of online financial content to promote informed and sustainable investment practices.
Suggested Citation
Tang My Sang, 2026.
"Integrating behavioral, social, and technological factors in cryptocurrency investment decisions,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(4), pages 1-19, April.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0332256
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332256
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0332256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.