IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0329300.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measurement and evolution of government attention to the health industry in China based on the BERTopic model

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Jin
  • Hongbin Du
  • Zhaoyu Liu

Abstract

Objectives: This paper aims to measure the government’s attention to the health industry accurately, which is crucial for understanding policy directions and resource allocation strategies. Methods: Addressing the limitations of traditional word frequency methods, such as restricted word segmentation and ambiguous terms, the BERTopic (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Topic Modeling) is applied to measure government attention at the sentence level. Rule matching in an ambiguous dictionary, which is expanded by utilizing the word2vec model, is to achieve accurate identification of unclassified topics. This approach reveals policy concerns at the semantic level. Results: The BERTopic model is a more precise instrument for evaluating the health industry’s attention. Furthermore, significant regional differences are detected. Attention in the Northeast has declined, remained stable in the Central and Western regions, and continuously increased in the Eastern region. The main areas of government attention in the health industry are sports and fitness, environmental governance, medical services, and healthy older individuals’ care. The mode of medical care in healthy retirement has evolved to a combination of medical care and health preservation. Conclusions: It is recommended that the balanced development of the health industry across regions be promoted based on specific local conditions. Efforts should also be made to enhance the efficiency of medical services, optimize the allocation mechanism for medical resources, establish a systematic medical treatment plan, and encourage the comprehensive and coordinated development of the health industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Jin & Hongbin Du & Zhaoyu Liu, 2025. "Measurement and evolution of government attention to the health industry in China based on the BERTopic model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(8), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329300
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329300
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329300
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0329300&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0329300?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John, Peter & Jennings, Will, 2010. "Punctuations and Turning Points in British Politics: The Policy Agenda of the Queen’s Speech, 1940–2005," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 561-586, July.
    2. Qi Wang & Mengdi Liu & Jintao Xu & Bing Zhang, 2023. "Blow the Lid Off: Public Complaints, Bargaining Power, and Government Responsiveness on Social Media," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 85(1), pages 133-166, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Peng & Tom Christensen & Liu Yihong & Chu Chun, 2024. "Power Structure, Issue Priorities and Attention Dynamics of Leaders from 2001 to 2017 in China," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 351-368, March.
    2. Roman Senninger, 2017. "Issue expansion and selective scrutiny – how opposition parties used parliamentary questions about the European Union in the national arena from 1973 to 2013," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(2), pages 283-306, June.
    3. Frank M Häge, 2016. "Political attention in the Council of the European Union: A new dataset of working party meetings, 1995–2014," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(4), pages 683-703, December.
    4. Ki Woong Cho, 2024. "Home Team Effect and Opinion Network after the Sewol Ferry Disaster: A mixed-method study of the influence of symbol and feedback on liberal versus conservative newspapers’ negative opinions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Tracey Bark, 2021. "Information provision as agenda setting: A study of bureaucracy's role in higher education policy," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 408-427, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0329300. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.