IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0326911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social media influencer or traditional celebrity? Moderational analysis on the relationship between endorser type and endorsement effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Chen-Yueh Chen
  • Yi-Hsiu Lin
  • Tzu-Yun Yeh
  • Ya-Lun Chou
  • Tsu-Lin Yeh

Abstract

The effectiveness of an endorsement depends on the endorser. Social media influencers and traditional celebrities are both prized as endorsers by advertisers. Studies comparing the effectiveness of these two endorser types has yielded inconsistent results. The effectiveness of a type of endorser depends on the advertising context. The present study explored the moderating effects of product–endorser fit, popularity, self-congruity, similarity, and likeability on the relationship between endorser type and consumer attitudes toward an endorsement in two different sporting contexts. A multiple-factor, independent sample, pretest–posttest, quasi-experimental design was implemented. In total, 473 participants were enrolled in four experiments. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of covariance and hierarchical linear regression. The results indicate that product–endorser fit, popularity, self-congruity, and similarity but not likeability moderate the relationship between endorser type and consumer attitudes toward an endorsement. This study contributes to the literature on endorsement marketing and helps marketers more effectively choose an endorser that fits the given marketing context.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen-Yueh Chen & Yi-Hsiu Lin & Tzu-Yun Yeh & Ya-Lun Chou & Tsu-Lin Yeh, 2025. "Social media influencer or traditional celebrity? Moderational analysis on the relationship between endorser type and endorsement effectiveness," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326911
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326911
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0326911&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0326911?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0326911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.