IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An exploratory study on the publication stages of early access articles in different bibliographic databases: A case study of IEEE journals

Author

Listed:
  • Yunu Zhu

Abstract

Currently bibliographic databases have included a large number of Early Access (EA) articles. Taking 47 IEEE journals as examples, this study analyzed and compared the differences in publication stages of EA articles in three typical bibliographic databases, including Web of Science Core Collection, Scopus, and Engineering Village Compendex. Qualitative analysis of data sets that may appear in these three databases and their publication stage modes, and quantitative analysis on the number of records, proportion, and journal distributions of each data set and each publication stage mode were conducted. There were totally 7 sub-data sets and corresponding 26 publication stage modes, with 14 “undifferentiated publication stage modes” and 12 “differentiated publication stage modes”. Although the proportion of EA records from each “differentiated publication stage mode” was mostly below 1.0%, the absolute quantity of EA records with differences in the publication stage was noteworthy reaching 2516. Among the 47 journals, 23 journals have 7–8 publication stage modes, 1 journal having 18 modes, and 40 journals have one or more “differentiated publication stage modes”. Therefore, in IEEE journals, whether for the same EA article or the same journal, the difference in publication stage between these three databases was pervasive and complex.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunu Zhu, 2025. "An exploratory study on the publication stages of early access articles in different bibliographic databases: A case study of IEEE journals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325787
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325787
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325787&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Dong & Marie Loh & Adrian Mondry, 2006. "Publication lag in biomedical journals varies due to the periodical's publishing model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 69(2), pages 271-286, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrada Elena Urda-Cîmpean & Sorana D. Bolboacă & Andrei Achimaş-Cadariu & Tudor Cătălin Drugan, 2016. "Knowledge Production in Two Types of Medical PhD Routes—What’s to Gain?," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Carlos B. Amat, 2008. "Editorial and publication delay of papers submitted to 14 selected Food Research journals. Influence of online posting," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(3), pages 379-389, March.
    3. Daniel A. Charen & Nolan A. Maher & Nicole Zubizarreta & Jashvant Poeran & Calin S. Moucha & Shai Shemesh, 2020. "Evaluation of publication delays in the orthopedic surgery manuscript review process from 2010 to 2015," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1127-1135, August.
    4. Gad Saad, 2010. "Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 83(2), pages 423-433, May.
    5. Estevao Alves-Silva & Ana Carolina Figueira Porto & Carine Firmino & Henrique Venancio Silva & Ingrid Becker & Liegy Resende & Livia Borges & Luana Pfeffer & Marcela Silvano & Melina Santos Galdiano &, 2016. "Are the impact factor and other variables related to publishing time in ecology journals?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(3), pages 1445-1453, September.
    6. Björk, Bo-Christer & Solomon, David, 2013. "The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(4), pages 914-923.
    7. Paul Sebo & Jean Pascal Fournier & Claire Ragot & Pierre-Henri Gorioux & François R. Herrmann & Hubert Maisonneuve, 2019. "Factors associated with publication speed in general medical journals: a retrospective study of bibliometric data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 119(2), pages 1037-1058, May.
    8. Lokman Tutuncu, 2023. "All-pervading insider bias alters review time in Turkish university journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3743-3791, June.
    9. Yunu Zhu, 2025. "A study of the index time of early access articles," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(1), pages 159-186, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.