IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0325726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“A PhD is just going to somehow break you”: A qualitative study exploring the role of peer support for doctoral students

Author

Listed:
  • Fiona Newlands
  • Tanvi Markan
  • Isabelle Pomfret
  • Emily Davey
  • Tom King
  • Anna Roach
  • Millie Wagstaff
  • Tom G Osborn
  • Roz Shafran
  • Polly Livermore
  • Michelle de Haan
  • Jeanne Wolstencroft
  • Sophie Bennett

Abstract

Doctoral (PhD) students experience high rates of mental health challenges, including high rates of anxiety, depression, loneliness, and isolation. While universities offer mental health services, these may not fully address the specific needs of doctoral students. Peer support has emerged as a promising adjunct to existing service provision, drawing on shared experiences to provide emotional and practical guidance. This study aimed to explore doctoral students’ perceptions of peer support, identifying their needs and preferences for a peer support programme tailored to the doctoral experience. Nineteen doctoral students were recruited from a university in the south of England and participated in focus groups or semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis yielded four overarching themes: (1) Barriers to seeking support; (2) Value of peer support for doctoral students; (3) Tailored peer support needs; and (4) Diversity and accessibility. Findings indicate that doctoral students value peer support as a flexible, informal space to share experiences and gain advice from those with similar backgrounds. However, they also emphasised the need for diverse representation among peer supporters, adaptable training to meet neurodiverse needs, and formal recognition of peer supporters’ contributions. Study findings suggest that universities should consider implementing tailored peer support programmes to address the specific challenges faced by doctoral students, incorporating flexibility, cultural sensitivity, and accessibility to create a supportive academic environment. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of such programs in improving doctoral students’ mental health and well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Fiona Newlands & Tanvi Markan & Isabelle Pomfret & Emily Davey & Tom King & Anna Roach & Millie Wagstaff & Tom G Osborn & Roz Shafran & Polly Livermore & Michelle de Haan & Jeanne Wolstencroft & Sophi, 2025. "“A PhD is just going to somehow break you”: A qualitative study exploring the role of peer support for doctoral students," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0325726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0325726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cassie M. Hazell & Jeremy E. Niven & Laura Chapman & Paul E. Roberts & Sam Cartwright-Hatton & Sophie Valeix & Clio Berry, 2021. "Nationwide assessment of the mental health of UK Doctoral Researchers," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0325726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.