IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0319551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of text-based plagiarism detection techniques

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Sajid
  • Muhammad Sanaullah
  • Muhammad Fuzail
  • Tauqeer Safdar Malik
  • Shuhaida Mohamed Shuhidan

Abstract

In text analysis, identifying plagiarism is a crucial area of study that looks for copied information in a document and determines whether or not the same author writes portions of the text. With the emergence of publicly available tools for content generation based on large language models, the problem of inherent plagiarism has grown in importance across various industries. Students are increasingly committing plagiarism as a result of the availability and use of computers in the classroom and the generally extensive accessibility of electronic information found on the internet. As a result, there is a rising need for reliable and precise detection techniques to deal with this changing environment. This paper compares several plagiarism detection techniques and looks into how well different detection systems can distinguish between content created by humans and content created by Artificial Intelligence (AI). This article systematically evaluates 189 research papers published between 2019 and 2024 to provide an overview of the research on computational approaches for plagiarism detection (PD). We suggest a new technically focused structure for efforts to prevent and identify plagiarism, types of plagiarism, and computational techniques for detecting plagiarism to organize the way the research contributions are presented. We demonstrated that the field of plagiarism detection is rife with ongoing research. Significant progress has been made in the field throughout the time we reviewed in terms of automatically identifying plagiarism that is highly obscured and hence difficult to recognize. The exploration of nontextual contents, the use of machine learning, and improved semantic text analysis techniques are the key sources of these advancements. Based on our analysis, we concluded that the combination of several analytical methodologies for textual and nontextual content features is the most promising subject for future research contributions to further improve the detection of plagiarism.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Sajid & Muhammad Sanaullah & Muhammad Fuzail & Tauqeer Safdar Malik & Shuhaida Mohamed Shuhidan, 2025. "Comparative analysis of text-based plagiarism detection techniques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(4), pages 1-28, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319551
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319551
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0319551&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0319551?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0319551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.