IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0313309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author

Listed:
  • Ding Yu
  • Jun-xia Li
  • Yuan Cheng
  • Han-dong Wang
  • Xin-di Ma
  • Tao Ding
  • Zhong-ning Zhu

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various antihypertensive drugs in preventing strokes in hypertensive patients. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in stroke prevention from inception until April 2023. A network meta-analysis in a Bayesian framework was performed using the random-effects model. Results: This study included 88 RCTs involving 487,076 patients to investigate the effects of antihypertensive drugs in preventing stroke. Among these trials, 58 RCTs specifically focused on comparing the impact of such drugs on hypertensive subjects. In overall population, Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs), Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), Calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and Diuretics (DIs) demonstrated superiority over placebo in in reducing stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. CCBs and DIs outperformed β adrenergic receptor blockers (BBs), ACEIs, and ARBs in stroke reduction. However, when focusing on hypertensive patients, ACEIs, CCBs, and DIs proved superior to placebo in reducing stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. ARBs reduced stroke and all-cause mortality but lacked efficacy in reducing cardiovascular mortality. Of the various CCB subclasses, only the Dihydropyridines displayed efficacy in preventing stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. Among diuretic subclasses, thiazide-type DIs exhibited no efficacy in preventing all-cause mortality. ACEIs+CCBs were more effective than ACEIs or ARBs monotherapy in reducing stroke, more effective than ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, or DIs monotherapy in reducing all-cause mortality, and more effective than ARBs in reducing cardiovascular mortality. Conclusion: These findings suggest that ACEIs, dihydropyridine CCBs, and thiazide-like diuretics may provide superior prevention against stroke, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Combinations of ACEIs and CCBs may provide enhanced protection of stroke than ACEIs or ARBs monotherapy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ding Yu & Jun-xia Li & Yuan Cheng & Han-dong Wang & Xin-di Ma & Tao Ding & Zhong-ning Zhu, 2025. "Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-28, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313309
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0313309&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0313309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adriani Nikolakopoulou & Julian P T Higgins & Theodoros Papakonstantinou & Anna Chaimani & Cinzia Del Giovane & Matthias Egger & Georgia Salanti, 2020. "CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Theodoros Papakonstantinou & Adriani Nikolakopoulou & Julian P. T. Higgins & Matthias Egger & Georgia Salanti, 2020. "CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(1), March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateus B Souza & Rodrigo O Mascarenhas & Laisa B Maia & Letícia S Fonseca & Hytalo J Silva & Rutger M J de Zoete & James H McAuley & Nicholas Henschke & Vinicius C Oliveira, 2022. "Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-pharmacological interventions in fibromyalgia: Protocol for a network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, October.
    2. Anelise Silveira & Camila Lima & Lauren Beaupre & Judy Chepeha & Allyson Jones, 2024. "Shoulder specific exercise therapy is effective in reducing chronic shoulder pain: A network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Sachika Yamakita & Takeshi Unoki & Sachi Niiyama & Eri Natsuhori & Junpei Haruna & Tomoki Kuribara, 2024. "Comparative efficacy of various oral hygiene care methods in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Ariel M. Aloe & Ruth Garside, 2021. "Editorial: Types of methods research papers in the journal Campbell Systematic Reviews," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), June.
    5. Jiawen Deng & Myron Moskalyk & Wenteng Hou & Qi Kang Zuo & Jinyu Luo, 2024. "Pharmacological prevention of bone loss and fractures following solid organ transplantations: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-9, April.
    6. Khanh Dinh Hoang & Jin-Hua Chen & Tsai-Wei Huang & Yi-No Kang & Chiehfeng Chen, 2024. "Oral aspirin for preventing colorectal adenoma recurrence: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Jesse Elliott & Amy Johnston & Don Husereau & Shannon E Kelly & Caroline Eagles & Alice Charach & Shu-Ching Hsieh & Zemin Bai & Alomgir Hossain & Becky Skidmore & Eva Tsakonas & Dagmara Chojecki & Muh, 2020. "Pharmacologic treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: A systematic review and network meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-35, October.
    8. Jihoon Lim & Imen Farhat & Antonios Douros & Dimitra Panagiotoglou, 2022. "Relative effectiveness of medications for opioid-related disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-30, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0313309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.